تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری مالی زنجیره تأمین صنایع غذایی در دوران همه گیری

طلایی, حمیدرضا

doi:https://doi.org/10.61186/jii.1.3.197

تحلیل عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری مالی زنجیره تأمین صنایع غذایی در دوران همه گیری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

حمیدرضا طلایی

استادیار، گروه مدیریت صنعتی، دانشکده علوم اداری و اقتصاد، دانشگاه اراک، اراک، ایران

https://doi.org/10.61186/jii.1.3.197

چکیده

در دوران همه‌گیری، حفظ بقای شرکای زنجیره تأمین و ایجاد پایداری مالی به‌خصوص در صنایع غذایی اهمیت زیادی پیدا می‌کند، لذا هدف از انجام پژوهش حاضر، شناسایی و رتبه‌بندی عوامل مؤثر بر پایداری مالی زنجیره تأمین صنایع غذایی در دوران همه‌گیری می‌باشد. پژوهش حاضر ازنظر هدف کاربردی و از منظر روش تحقیق از نوع آمیخته می‌باشد. نمونه آماری این تحقیق شامل 15 نفر از خبرگان حوزه مالی در مدیریت زنجیره تأمین صنایع غذایی است. شناسایی عوامل بر اساس مرور ادبیات صورت‌گرفته است. سپس بر اساس روش دلفی و با کمک پرسشنامه طی سه مرحله عمل غربالگری صورت گرفته و درنهایت از میان 22 معیار شناسایی‌شده، خبرگان در تائید 14 معیار به اجماع نظر رسیدند و به‌منظور رتبه‌بندی عوامل نهایی از تکنیک فرایند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی استفاده شده است. با توجه به نتایج حاصل از فرایند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی، مشارکت ذینفعان در دوران همه‌گیری در اولویت اول، مدیریت سیاست‌های تحویل خدمات در اولویت دوم و مدیریت پسماند در دوران همه‌گیری در اولویت سوم قرار دارد. یافته‌های این تحقیق می‌تواند راهگشای مدیران حوزه صنعت غذا در دوران بروز بحران باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

بحران

مدیریت زنجیره‌تامین

همه‌گیری

پایداری مالی

عنوان مقاله English

Analyzing the Factors Affecting the Financial Sustainability of the Food Industry Supply Chain during the Pandemic

نویسنده English

HamidReza Talaie

Department of industrial management, Faculty of Administrative Sciences and Economics, Arak University, arak, Iran

چکیده English

During the pandemic, maintaining the survival of the supply chain partners and creating financial sustainability, especially in the food industry, becomes very important, so the purpose of this research is to identifying and ranking the factors affecting the financial sustainability of the food supply chain in a pandemic. This research is mixed method in terms of methodology and practical in terms of purpose. The statistical sample of this research includes 15 financial experts in food industry supply chain management. Factors have been identified based on literature review. Then, based on the Delphi method and with the help of a questionnaire, it was screened in three stages, and finally, among the 22 identified criteria, the experts reached a consensus in confirming 14 criteria, and in order to rank the final factors, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique was used. According to the results of AHP, the participation of stakeholders during the pandemic is the first priority, the management of service delivery policies is the second priority, and the waste management is the third priority during the pandemic. The findings of this research can open the way for the managers of the food industry during the crisis.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Crisis

Supply Chain Management

Epidemic

Financial Sustainability

[1] Ruggerio CA. Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the Total Environment. 2021;786:147481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481.
[2] Chowdhury P, Paul SK, Kaisar S, Moktadir MA. COVID-19 pandemic related supply chain studies: A systematic review. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. 2021;148:102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102271.
[3] Fortune. 1000-coronavirus- china-supply chain- impact. 2020.
[4] Leal Filho W, Brandli LL, Lange Salvia A, Rayman-Bacchus L, Platje J. COVID-19 and the UN sustainable development goals: threat to solidarity or an opportunity? Sustainability. 2020;12:5343. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135343.
[5] Barrow C. Environmental issues in development. The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology. 2018:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea1463.
[6] Agrawal S, Singh P, Mazumdar M. Innovation, firm size and ownership: a study of firm transition in India. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness. 2021;16:15-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-021-00022-y.
[7] Ren Y-S, Ma C-Q, Chen X-Q, Lei Y-T, Wang Y-R. Sustainable finance and blockchain: A systematic review and research agenda. Research in International Business and Finance. 2023:101871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101871.
[8] Fu Q, Abdul Rahman AA, Jiang H, Abbas J, Comite U. Sustainable supply chain and business performance: The impact of strategy, network design, information systems, and organizational structure. Sustainability. 2022;14:1080. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031080.
[9] Sharma M, Luthra S, Joshi S, Kumar A. Developing a framework for enhancing survivability of sustainable supply chains during and post-COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications. 2022;25:433-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2020.1810213.
[10] Cunha FAFdS, Meira E, Orsato RJ. Sustainable finance and investment: Review and research agenda. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2021;30:3821-38. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2842.
[11] Mohaghar A, Hashemi Petrodi SH, Talaei H. Dynamic Modeling of a New Product Supply Chain using System Dynamics Approach. Journal of industrial management perspective. 2017;6:9-36. [In Persian]
[12] Arulraj DJ, Annamalai TR. Firms’ financing choices and firm productivity: Evidence from an emerging economy. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness. 2020;15:35-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-020-00008-2.
[13] KhanMohammadi E, Talaie H, Safari H, Salehzadeh R. Supplier evaluation and selection for sustainable supply chain management under uncertainty conditions. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering. 2018;11:382-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/19397038.2017.1421277.
[14] Kumar S, Sharma D, Rao S, Lim WM, Mangla SK. Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research. Annals of Operations Research. 2022:1-44. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003156291-1.
[15] Le TT. How do food supply chain performance measures contribute to sustainable corporate performance during disruptions from the COVID-19 pandemic emergency? International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 2023;40:1233-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-03-2022-0089.
[16] Tseng M-L, Wu K-J, Hu J, Wang C-H. Decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainties. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;205:30-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.08.024.
[17] Jia F, Zhang T, Chen L. Sustainable supply chain Finance: Towards a research agenda. Journal of cleaner production. 2020;243:118680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118680.
[18] Curi C, Murgia LM. Forecast Targeting and Financial Stability: Evidence from the European Central Bank and Bank of England. Finance Research Letters. 2023;51:103486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103486.
[19] Silvestre BS. Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Environmental turbulence, institutional voids and sustainability trajectories. International Journal of Production Economics. 2015;167:156-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.05.025.
[20] Mani V, Gunasekaran A, Delgado C. Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics. 2018;198:149-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.032.
[21] Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed R, Sallam K, Elhoseny M. A novel decision-making model for sustainable supply chain finance under uncertainty environment. Journal of cleaner production. 2020;269:122324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122324.
[22] Karmaker CL, Ahmed T, Ahmed S, Ali SM, Moktadir MA, Kabir G. Improving supply chain sustainability in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in an emerging economy: Exploring drivers using an integrated model. Sustainable production and consumption. 2021;26:411-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.019.
[23] Rezaee Z. Supply chain management and business sustainability synergy: A theoretical and integrated perspective. Sustainability. 2018;10:275. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010275.
[24] Özbay D. Sustainable supply chain management and financial performance: An empirical analysis of Turkish manufacturing companies. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal. 2021;9:908-21. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v9i3.1846.
[25] Mohammadi AS, Alem Tabriz A, Pishvaee MS. Proposing model for master planning of sustainable supply chain with considering integration of physical and financial flow. Journal of industrial management perspective. 2018;8:39-62. [In Persian]
[26] Aminnaseri F, Kherdyar S, Tahmasbi H, Chirani E. Dynamic modeling of Sustainable supply chain from the financial perspective: system dynamics approach. Journal of Investment Knowledge. 2021;10:79-102. [In Persian]
[27] Gupta N, Soni G. A decision-making framework for sustainable supply chain finance in post-COVID era. International Journal of Global Business and Competitiveness. 2021;16:29-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42943-021-00028-6.
[28] Hayat K, Jianjun Z, Zameer H, Iqbal S. Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility practices on impulse buying. Corporate social responsibility and environmental management. 2020;27:1454-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1898.
[29] Sim J, Prabhu V. A microcredit contract model with a Black Scholes model under default risk. International Journal of Production Economics. 2017;193:294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.004.
[30] Ahi P, Searcy C. An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. Journal of cleaner production. 2015;86:360-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.08.005.
[31] Aliabadi L, Yazdanparast R, Nasiri MM. An inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with credit period and carbon emission sensitive demand: a signomial geometric programming approach. International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management. 2019;14:124-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509653.2018.1504331.
[32] Aljazzar SM, Gurtu A, Jaber MY. Delay-in-payments-A strategy to reduce carbon emissions from supply chains. Journal of cleaner production. 2018;170:636-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.177.
[33] Tsao Y-C, Lee P-L, Chen C-H, Liao Z-W. Sustainable newsvendor models under trade credit. Journal of cleaner production. 2017;141:1478-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.228.
[34] Van der Vliet K, Reindorp MJ, Fransoo JC. The price of reverse factoring: Financing rates vs. payment delays. European Journal of Operational Research. 2015;242:842-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.10.052.
[35] Cho DW, Lee YH, Ahn SH, Hwang MK. A framework for measuring the performance of service supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2012;62:801-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.11.014.
[36] Zhan J, Li S, Chen X. The impact of financing mechanism on supply chain sustainability and efficiency. Journal of cleaner production. 2018;205:407-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.347.
[37] De Meyrick J. The Delphi method and health research. Health education. 2003;103:7-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/09654280310459112.
[38] Landeta J. Current validity of the Delphi method in social sciences. Technological forecasting and social change. 2006;73:467-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.09.002.
[39] Sathyan R, Parthiban P, Dhanalakshmi R, Sachin M. An integrated Fuzzy MCDM approach for modelling and prioritising the enablers of responsiveness in automotive supply chain using Fuzzy DEMATEL, Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Soft Computing. 2023;27:257-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07591-x.
[40] Saaty TL. Decision making—the analytic hierarchy and network processes (AHP/ANP). Journal of systems science and systems engineering. 2004;13:1-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-006-0179-6.
[41] Hamidizadeh M, Mohammadi A, Talaei H. Explaining the Competency Model for Supply Chain Strategy. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 2014;16:30-9. [In Persian]