نوآوری‌های صنعتی

نوآوری‌های صنعتی

ارائه مدل تصمیم‌گیری فازی به‌منظور تعیین مکان مناسب جهت احداث مراکز جمع‌آوری پسماند کشاورزی مبتنی بر ابعاد پایداری و تاب‌آوری

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مهندسی شیمی و صنایع، دانشگاه علم و فناوری مازندران، بهشهر، ایران
2 گروه مهندسی صنابع، دانشکده مهندسی شیمی و صنایع، دانشگاه علم و فناوری مازندران، بهشهر، ایران
3 گروه مهندسی صنایع، دانشکده مکانیک و صنایع، دانشگاه نوشیروانی، بابل، ایران
چکیده
در سال‌های اخیر، با افزایش چشمگیر جمعیت، تقاضا برای محصولات کشاورزی به‌طور قابل‌توجهی افزایش‌یافته که این امر به رشد تولید در این صنعت منجر شده است. درنتیجه مدیریت پسماند در صنعت کشاورزی به یکی از چالش‌های اساسی مدیران تبدیل‌شده است. انتخاب مکان مناسب برای احداث مراکز برخورد با پسماند کشاورزی نقش قابل‌توجهی در کارآمدی سیستم مدیریت پسماند دارد. ازاین‌رو، پژوهش حاضر به مطالعه مساله انتخاب مکان مناسب برای احداث مراکز برخورد با پسماند کشاورزی و ساخت تسهیلات با در نظر گرفتن معیارهای پایداری و تاب‌آوری پرداخته که تسهیلات آن شامل مراکز تولید رنگ، مراکز تولید کمپوست و مراکز تولید اسانس و عصاره (به‌ طور خاص زعفران) می‌باشد. بدین منظور، این پژوهش از روش‌های فازی سوارا و فازی ایداس برای ارزیابی نقاط بالقوه استفاده کرده است. نتایج بیانگر آن است که هر مکان چه امتیازی دارد و با انتخاب مکان‌های با امتیاز بیشتر می‌توانیم پایداری و تاب‌آوری را به حداکثر برسانیم و برای صحت محاسبات از روش فازی مارکوس استفاده‌شده که نتایج حاصل از رتبه‌بندی روش فازی مارکوس و فازی ایداس بسیار مشابه است که خود نشان‌دهنده درست بودن فرایند محاسبات می‌باشد و همچنین کارایی مدل در تعیین نقاط مناسب برای احداث مراکز برخورد با پسماند را نشان می‌دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Presenting a fuzzy decision-making model for determining suitable locations for establishing agricultural waste collection centers based on sustainability and resilience dimensions.

نویسندگان English

Seyedeh Sara Asadi 1
Mohsen Rezaei 2
Sina Nayeri 3
1 Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Science and Technology of Mazandaran, Behshahr, Iran
2 Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Science and Technology of Mazandaran, Behshahr, Iran
3 Department of Industrial Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran
چکیده English

In recent years, with the significant increase in population, the demand for agricultural products has considerably risen, leading to growth in this industry. Consequently, waste management in the agricultural sector has become one of the major challenges for managers. The selection of suitable locations for establishing agricultural waste treatment centers plays a crucial role in the efficiency of the waste management system. Therefore, this study examines the issue of selecting appropriate locations for the establishment of agricultural waste treatment facilities while considering sustainability and resilience criteria. These facilities include pigment production centers, compost production centers, and essential oil and extract production centers (specifically saffron). To achieve this goal, the study employs the Fuzzy Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (Fuzzy SWARA) and Fuzzy Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (Fuzzy EDAS) methods to evaluate potential sites. The results indicate the score of each location, and by selecting higher-scoring sites, sustainability and resilience can be maximized. Additionally, the Fuzzy Measurement Alternatives and Ranking according to the Compromise Solution (Fuzzy MARCOS) method has been used to validate the calculations, demonstrating that the ranking results of the Fuzzy MARCOS and Fuzzy EDAS methods are highly similar, confirming the accuracy of the computational process. This also highlights the effectiveness of the model in identifying suitable locations for establishing agricultural waste treatment centers.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Waste Management
Agricultural Industry
Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
[1]    Koul B, Yakoob M, Shah MP. Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability. Environ Res 2022;206:112285. 
[2]    Karak T, Bhagat RM, Bhattacharyya P. Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Composition, and Management: The World Scenario. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 2012;42:1509–630. 
[3]    Shekhawat P, Shrivastava S, Shrivastava N. Agricultural Waste Utilization in Sustainable and Resilient Construction. Advances in Waste Management 2019:385–93. 
[4]    Zargaran Khouzani MR, Dehghani Ghahfarokhi Z. Evaluation of Agricultural Waste Management Mechanism in Iran. Industrial and Domestic Waste Management 2022;2:113–24.
[5]    Ayorinde Dada M, Obaigbena A, Tega Majemite M, Sunday Oliha J, Winston Biu P, Author C. INNOVATIVE APPROACHES TO WASTE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY AND POLICY. Engineering Science & Technology Journal 2024;5:115–27. 
[6]    Marrone G, Urciuoli S, Lauro M Di, Nutrients KC-, 2024 undefined. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.) and Its By-Products: Healthy Effects in Internal Medicine. MdpiComG Marrone, S Urciuoli, M Di Lauro, K Cornali, G Montalto, C Masci, G Vanni, M TesauroNutrients, 2024•mdpiCom 2024.
[7]    Lahmass I, Lamkami T, Delporte C, Sikdar S, Van Antwerpen P, Saalaoui E, et al. The waste of saffron crop, a cheap source of bioactive compounds. J Funct Foods 2017;35:341–51. 
[8]    Feinstein NW, Kirchgasler KL. Sustainability in Science Education? How the Next Generation Science Standards Approach Sustainability, and Why It Matters. Sci Educ 2015;99:121–44. 
[9]    Agbedahin AV. Sustainable development, Education for Sustainable Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development 2019;27:669–80. 
[10] Nayeri S, Sazvar Z, Heydari J. A global-responsive supply chain considering sustainability and resiliency: Application in the medical devices industry. Socioecon Plann Sci 2022;82. 
[11] Cariappa AA, Acharya KK, Adhav CA, Sendhil R, Ramasundaram P. COVID-19 induced lockdown effects on agricultural commodity prices and consumer behaviour in India – Implications for food loss and waste management. Socioecon Plann Sci 2022;82. 
[12] Nayeri S, Sazvar Z, Heydari J. A global-responsive supply chain considering sustainability and resiliency: Application in the medical devices industry. Socioecon Plann Sci 2022;82. 
[13] Hosouli S, Engineering RH-R in, 2024 undefined. Application of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) model for solar plant location selection. ElsevierS Hosouli, RA HassaniResults in Engineering, 2024•Elsevier n.d.
[14] Jabbari N, Goli M, Shahi S. Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Saffron Petals Using Ultrasound-Assisted Acidified Ethanol Solvent: Adding Value to Food Waste. Foods 2024;13.
[15] Ufitikirezi J de DM, Filip M, Ghorbani M, Zoubek T, Olšan P, Bumbálek R, et al. Agricultural Waste Valorization: Exploring Environmentally Friendly Approaches to Bioenergy Conversion. Sustainability 2024, Vol 16, Page 3617 2024;16:3617. 
[16] Kang Y, Yabar H, Mizunoya T, Challenges YH-E, 2024 undefined. Optimal landfill site selection using arcgis multi-criteria decision-making (mcdm) and analytic hierarchy process (ahp) for kinshasa city. ElsevierYO Kang, H Yabar, T Mizunoya, Y HiganoEnvironmental Challenges, 2024•Elsevier n.d.
[17] Hsu E. Cost-benefit analysis for recycling of agricultural wastes in Taiwan. Waste Management 2021;120:424–32. 
[18] Broitman D, Raviv O, Ayalon O, Kan I. Absorbing shocks: Designing an agriculture vegetative waste management system resilient to final product price fluctuations 2017.
[19] Tran TH, Nguyen TBT, Le HST, Phung DC. Formulation and solution technique for agricultural waste collection and transport network design. Eur J Oper Res 2024;313:1152–69. 
[20] Sumiyati S, Samadikun BP, Widiyanti A, Budihardjo MA, Al Qadar S, Puspita AS. Global Journal of Environmental Science and Management Life cycle assessment of agricultural waste recycling for sustainable environmental impact ARTICLE INFO Podcasts. Global J Environ Sci Manage 2024;10:907–38. 
[21] Pareek S. Enhancing growth and nutrient uptake in boufegous date palm variety with seaweed extracts and AMF/PGPR combination in the field 2024;40. https://doi.org/10.35248/0970-1907.24.40.1229-1231.
[22] Anand S, Barua MK. Modeling the key factors leading to post-harvest loss and waste of fruits and vegetables in the agri-fresh produce supply chain. Comput Electron Agric 2022;198:106936. 
[23] Nicoletti J, Ning C, You F. Incorporating Agricultural Waste-to-Energy Pathways into Biomass Product and Process Network through Data-Driven Nonlinear Adaptive Robust Optimization. 2019.
[24] Morales Chavez MM, Costa Y, Sarache W. A three-objective stochastic location-inventory-routing model for agricultural waste-based biofuel supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 2021;162. 
[25] Rahbari M, Khamseh AA, Mohammadi M. A Multi-objective Robust Scenario-based Stochastic Chance Constrained Programming Model for Sustainable Closed-loop Agri-food Supply Chain. Comput Chem Eng 2024:108914.
[26] Sagnak M, Berberoglu Y, Memis İ, Yazgan O. Sustainable collection center location selection in emerging economy for electronic waste with fuzzy Best-Worst and fuzzy TOPSIS. Waste Management 2021;127:37–47.
[27] Iqbal M, Production YK-J of C, 2024 undefined. Circular economy of food: A secondary supply chain model on food waste management incorporating IoT based technology. ElsevierMW Iqbal, Y KangJournal of Cleaner Production, 2024•Elsevier 2024.
[28] Wangsa ID, Vanany I, Siswanto N. An optimization model for fresh-food electronic commerce supply chain with carbon emissions and food waste. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering 2023;40:1–21. 
[29] Vanany I, Wangsa ID, Jeremi NA. A Multi-objective Mixed-Integer Linear Model for Sustainable Dairy Supply Chain with Food Waste and Environmental Pollutants. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability 2024;8:723–40. 
[30] Nikolicic S, Kilibarda M, Maslaric M, Mircetic D, Bojic S. Reducing food waste in the retail supply chains by improving efficiency of logistics operations. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2021;13. 
[31] Mithun Ali S, Moktadir MA, Kabir G, Chakma J, Rumi MJU, Islam MT. Framework for evaluating risks in food supply chain: Implications in food wastage reduction. J Clean Prod 2019;228:786–800. 
[32] Amos O, Abiodun O, Olalekan O, Tolulope O. Evaluating urban service delivery in Lagos State Nigeria: A bid to enhance sustainable waste management 2024.
[33] Görçün Ö, Aytekin A, … SK-J of C, 2023 undefined. Evaluating and selecting sustainable logistics service providers for medical waste disposal treatment in the healthcare industry. ElsevierÖF Görçün, A Aytekin, S Korucuk, EB TirkolaeeJournal of Cleaner Production, 2023•Elsevier 2023.
[34]    Seif M, Yaghoubi S, Khodoomi MR. Optimization of food-energy-water-waste nexus in a sustainable food supply chain under the COVID-19 pandemic: a case study in Iran. Environ Dev Sustain 2024;26:7163–97. 
[35] Krishnan R, Arshinder K, Agarwal R. Robust optimization of sustainable food supply chain network considering food waste valorization and supply uncertainty. Comput Ind Eng 2022;171:108499. 
[36] Mahmudah R, Putri D, … AA-CE, 2024 undefined. Developing a Multi-Criteria Decision-Making model for nuclear power plant location selection using Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy VIKOR. ElsevierRSN Mahmudah, DI Putri, AG Abdullah, MA Shafii, DL Hakim, T SetiadipuraCleaner Engineering and Technology, 2024•Elsevier n.d.
[37] Eelagh M, Journal RA-DA, 2024 undefined. A location-allocation optimization model for post-earthquake emergency shelters using network-based multi-criteria decision-making. Elsevier n.d.
[38] Kannan G, … AH-IJ of, 2008 undefined. An application of the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process in the selection of collecting centre location for the reverse logistics. InderscienceonlineComG Kannan, AN Haq, P SasikumarInternational Journal of Management and Decision Making, 2008•inderscienceonlineCom 2008.
[39] Malik S, Kumari A, Proceedings SA-MT, 2015 undefined. Selection of locations of collection centers for reverse logistics using GTMA. ElsevierS Malik, A Kumari, S AgrawalMaterials Today: Proceedings, 2015•Elsevier 2015.
[40] Kumar A, Wasan P, Luthra S, Production GD-J of C, 2020 undefined. Development of a framework for selecting a sustainable location of waste electrical and electronic equipment recycling plant in emerging economies. ElsevierA Kumar, P Wasan, S Luthra, G DixitJournal of Cleaner Production, 2020•Elsevier 2020.
[41] Liao H, Qin R, Wu D, Yazdani M, Zavadskas EK. Pythagorean fuzzy combined compromise solution method integrating the cumulative prospect theory and combined weights for cold chain logistics distribution center selection. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 2020;35:2009–31. 
[42] Agrebi M, Abed M. Decision-making from multiple uncertain experts: case of distribution center location selection. Soft Comput 2021;25:4525–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00500-020-05461-Y/METRICS.
[43] Nong TNM. A hybrid model for distribution center location selection. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics 2022;38:40–9.
[44] Queiruga D, Walther G, management JG-B-W, 2008 undefined. Evaluation of sites for the location of WEEE recycling plants in Spain. ElsevierD Queiruga, G Walther, J Gonzalez-Benito, T SpenglerWaste Management, 2008•Elsevier 2008.
[45] Logistics TN-TAJ of S and, 2022 undefined. A hybrid model for distribution center location selection. ElsevierTNM NongThe Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 2022•Elsevier n.d.
[46] Guo S, Energy HZ-A, 2015 undefined. Optimal site selection of electric vehicle charging station by using fuzzy TOPSIS based on sustainability perspective. ElsevierS Guo, H ZhaoApplied Energy, 2015•Elsevier 2015.
[47] He Y, Wang X, Lin Y, Zhou F, D LZ-TRP, 2017 undefined. Sustainable decision making for joint distribution center location choice. ElsevierY He, X Wang, Y Lin, F Zhou, L ZhouTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2017•Elsevier 2017.
[48] Chauhan A, Production AS-J of C, 2016 undefined. A hybrid multi-criteria decision making method approach for selecting a sustainable location of healthcare waste disposal facility. ElsevierA Chauhan, A SinghJournal of Cleaner Production, 2016•Elsevier 2016. 
[49] Agrawal S, Singh R, Resources QM-, Recycling C and, 2016 undefined. Outsourcing decisions in reverse logistics: Sustainable balanced scorecard and graph theoretic approach. ElsevierS Agrawal, RK Singh, Q MurtazaResources, Conservation and Recycling, 2016•Elsevier 2016.
[50] Kheybari S, Kazemi M, energy JR-A, 2019 undefined. Bioethanol facility location selection using best-worst method. ElsevierS Kheybari, M Kazemi, J RezaeiApplied Energy, 2019•Elsevier 2019.
[51] Santibañez-Aguilar J, … JG-C-J of cleaner, 2014 undefined. Optimal planning and site selection for distributed multiproduct biorefineries involving economic, environmental and social objectives. ElsevierJE Santibañez-Aguilar, JB González-Campos, JM Ponce-Ortega, M Serna-GonzálezJournal of Cleaner Production, 2014•Elsevier 2014.
[52] Özceylan E, Çetinkaya C, Erbaş M, Part MK-TR, 2016 undefined. Logistic performance evaluation of provinces in Turkey: A GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis. ElsevierE Özceylan, C Çetinkaya, M Erbaş, M KabakTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2016•Elsevier 2016.
[53] Xu Y, Liu C, … KS-2015 IP&, 2015 undefined. Toward a resilient distribution system. IeeexploreIeeeOrgY Xu, CC Liu, KP Schneider, DT Ton2015 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting, 2015•ieeexploreIeeeOrg 2015.
[54] Kardani Malekinezhad M, Rahimnia F, Eslami G, Farahi MM. Human resource analytics adoption: a framework-based analysis, fuzzy Delphi method and fuzzy SWARA. Journal of Advances in Management Research 2025;ahead-of-print. 
[55] Kamali Saraji M, Streimikiene D, Ciegis R. A novel Pythagorean fuzzy-SWARA-TOPSIS framework for evaluating the EU progress towards sustainable energy development. Environ Monit Assess 2022;194. 
[56] Kurtay KG. Selection of Military Armored Vehicle Using Fuzzy EDAS method. Computer and Decision Making: An International Journal 2024;1:134–50. 
[57] Stanković M, Stević Ž, Das DK, Subotić M, Pamučar D. A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis. Mathematics 2020, Vol 8, Page 457 2020;8:457. 
دوره 2، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 6
تابستان 1403
صفحه 194-211

  • تاریخ دریافت 11 دی 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 21 اسفند 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 18 فروردین 1404